<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EIGRP Authentication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://evilrouters.net/2009/07/04/eigrp-authentication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://evilrouters.net/2009/07/04/eigrp-authentication/</link>
	<description>im in ur datacentrz configurin&#039; ur routerz</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:46:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: felixbourne</title>
		<link>http://evilrouters.net/2009/07/04/eigrp-authentication/comment-page-1/#comment-1447</link>
		<dc:creator>felixbourne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evilrouters.net/2009/07/04/eigrp-authentication/#comment-1447</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Could an attacker spoof the address of another router in order to kill a competitor&#039;s adjacency?  A flood of such crafted packets could be an effective DoS.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could an attacker spoof the address of another router in order to kill a competitor&#8217;s adjacency?  A flood of such crafted packets could be an effective DoS.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jlgaddis</title>
		<link>http://evilrouters.net/2009/07/04/eigrp-authentication/comment-page-1/#comment-1442</link>
		<dc:creator>jlgaddis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 03:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evilrouters.net/2009/07/04/eigrp-authentication/#comment-1442</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hmm, is it really a security vulnerability, invalidCCIE?  I&#039;m inclined to think that it&#039;s not since, at that point, R1 is only expecting authenticated updates.  If an update comes in that isn&#039;t authenticated, I think it&#039;s probably doing the right thing.  I&#039;d love to hear more on why you think it is a vulnerability, though.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, is it really a security vulnerability, invalidCCIE?  I&#8217;m inclined to think that it&#8217;s not since, at that point, R1 is only expecting authenticated updates.  If an update comes in that isn&#8217;t authenticated, I think it&#8217;s probably doing the right thing.  I&#8217;d love to hear more on why you think it is a vulnerability, though.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: invalidCCIE</title>
		<link>http://evilrouters.net/2009/07/04/eigrp-authentication/comment-page-1/#comment-1439</link>
		<dc:creator>invalidCCIE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 12:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evilrouters.net/2009/07/04/eigrp-authentication/#comment-1439</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;pay attention to one interesting thing:
if R1 receives  hello packet with invalid authentication from address of R2, it immediately drops adjacency (not just ignore incorrect packet).
from my point of view, it is security vulnerability :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pay attention to one interesting thing:
if R1 receives  hello packet with invalid authentication from address of R2, it immediately drops adjacency (not just ignore incorrect packet).
from my point of view, it is security vulnerability <img src='http://evilrouters.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
